![voynich manuscript decoded 2020 voynich manuscript decoded 2020](https://lostandtaken.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Voynich11.jpg)
But over time a picture is emerging that leads me to lend significant credence to some explanations over others. I do not yet think I know anything with certainty that no other researcher has established before me. For me it is however a wonderful case study and autoexperiment in the use of abductive inference. It may be that such people are scared away by the ravers one need only briefly glance at a list of all the time-travel, Illuminati, and UFOlogical theories the manuscript has inspired to see that it is a real intellectual danger zone.
#VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT DECODED 2020 HOW TO#
There seem to be very few proper palaeographers writing about this text: that is, people who know how to attend to handwriting and codicological evidence until plausible patterns of intention begin to emerge. They divide roughly into two camps: the cryptographers and information scientists, on the one hand (the “quants”, as we say), and on the other hand the ravers and enthusiasts, the people who do not know how to distinguish between gut feelings and real evidence. What compels me to come out is the discovery over this past year that for the most part commentators really do not know what they are doing. I've been studying hi-res scans of the manuscript off and on for four years or so, and I've been reading the so-called secondary literature for about a year. I think I'm finally ready to come out as a Voynich scholar.